Skip to main content

Posts

Devolution by Max Brooks

  Questions for Book Club January 15, 2022 1. Max Brooks writes: "I will let you judge for yourself if the following pages seem reasonably plausible." Do they? Does the premise of the novel—that Bigfoot exists—feel plausible to you? Why or why not? 2. Who, or what, are the Sasquatches, as portrayed in  Devolution ? Do you believe they exist? Does Max Brooks? 3. What was your experience reading  Devolution ? Did you find it suspenseful, frightening, gory, instructive? Something else? Or were you left, well… unmoved? 4. Talk about the tech-pioneers who formed the utopian community of Greenloop? What is their hope moving into a primeval rain forest—while still remaining linked to civilization by internet? Do you sympathize with their idealism, find them naive, or maybe hypocritical? 5. Whom in the novel are you most irritated by or impatient with? Which character do you most admire? 6. After Rainier's eruption, how and why does Mostar begin preparing for catastrophe—even tho...

S8.7 The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time by Mark Haddon

  The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time by  Mark Haddon 1.  On pages 45–48, Christopher describes his "Behavioral Problems" and the effect they had on his parents and their marriage. What is the effect of the dispassionate style in which he relates this information? 2.  Given Christopher's aversion to being touched, can he experience his parents' love for him, or can he only understand it as a fact, because they tell him they love him? Is there any evidence in the novel that he experiences a sense of attachment to other people? 3.  One of the unusual aspects of the novel is its inclusion of many maps and diagrams. How effective are these in helping the reader see the world through Christopher's eyes? 4.  What challenges does  The Curious Incident  present to the ways we usually think and talk about characters in novels? How does it force us to reexamine our normal ideas about love and desire, which are often the driving forces in ficti...

In the Time of the Butterflies-Julia Alvarez

Discussion Questions In the Time of Butterflies             Minerva, Patria and MarĂ­a Teresa  Mirabal Although she does not reveal the details, Alvarez lets us know from the start that the novel will end tragically. Why do you think she made this choice? How do the sisters differ in personality, goals and self-expression? How does Alvarez dramatize these differences? How does the Trujillo regime portray itself? What means does it use to build a positive public image? How does this police state control its citizens? How do its methods develop over the course of the novel? What kinds of violence are directed against women both politically and socially? How do these forms of violence connect to the experiences of the men? Turning again to the men in the book.  Does the father make you feel sympathetic or judgemental? Do your feelings change as the book progresses?  Is Jaimito a good man or not?   Alvarez has said, "You can get rid of a...

S8.6 Opium and Absinthe by Lydia Kang

Exerpt from Smithsonian article, Inside the Story of America’s 19th-Century Opiate Addiction, by Erick Trickey  1. The man was bleeding, wounded in a bar fight, half-conscious. Charles Schuppert, a New Orleans surgeon, was summoned to help. It was the late 1870s, and Schuppert, like thousands of American doctors of his era, turned to the most effective drug in his kit. “I gave him an injection of morphine subcutaneously of ½ grain,” Schuppert wrote in his casebook. “This acted like a charm, as he came to in a minute from the stupor he was in and rested very easily.” 2. Physicians like Schuppert used morphine as a new-fangled wonder drug. Injected with a hypodermic syringe, the medication relieved pain, asthma, headaches, alcoholics’ delirium tremens, gastrointestinal diseases and menstrual cramps. “Doctors were really impressed by the speedy results they got,” says David T. Courtwright, author of   Dark Paradise: A History of Opiate Addiction in America .  “It’s almost as...

S8.5 The Sherlockian by Graham Moore

  1.  Do you think you could solve a real murder using only the skills learned by reading detective stories?  2. Both Arthur Conan Doyle and Harold think that they can solve a real crime?  Are they being naive? Imaginative? Foolish?  Inspired?  3.  Have you ever been so angry about the death of a fictional character that you could imagine physically accosting his/her creator?   The Londoners of 1893 were evidently so upset about the death of Holmes that they became almost violent with his "murderer", Arthur Conan Doyle?  Could you imagine feeling more hurt over the death of a fictional character than over the death of a real person?  4.  Do you think the ending of The Sherlockian is happy or sad?  Both Harold and Arthur are, in a sense, worse off than when they both began.  And yet the last chapter suggests that at least the fiction endures.  Is this consolation or redemption? 5. Arthur starts the book as a firm ...